Motivation and Cotlar’s lemma
We always need to consider a transform on Hilbert space
(this is a discrete model), or a finite dimensional space
. If under a basis
is given by a diagonal matrix this story is easy,
Then .
In fact, for is a transform of a finite dimensional space,
is given by
by duality we have
, so we have,
If we have given and
.
But in application of this idea, the orthogonal condition always seems to be too restricted and due too this we have the following lemma which is follow the idea but change the orthogonal condition by almost orthogonal.
Lemma(Catlar-Stein)
Let
be finitely many operators on some Hilbert space
. Such that for some function
one has,
for any
. Let
. then ,
Pf:
tensor power trick + duality .
Singular integrals on
Lemma(Schur)
Define
is a operator on measure space
equipped positive product measure
, via,
is a measurable kernel, then,
1).
.
2).
.
3).
,
.
4).
.
Pf:
1),2),4) merely due to Fubini theorem and Bath lemma.
3) proof by the interpolation and combine 1) and 2).
Theorem
Let K be a Calderon-Zegmund operator, with the additional assumption
that
. Then
with
.
Caldero ́n–Vaillancourt theorem
Hardy’s inequality
Theorem(Hardy inequality)
For any
there is a constant
with the prop-
arty that,
for all
.
[…] given by transform from version of orthogonal to almost orthogonal which was merely explained in the previous note. We could image the following corresponding almost orthogonal variate of “Bessel […]
赞赞